Sunday, November 3, 2019

莫當學術自由掘墓人 華團不應該自我審查


我們對林連玉基金日前以「時機不當」為由,臨時腰斬原訂在1110日主辦的學術演講,深表遺憾。這種自我審查,有違主辦學術研討活動的初衷,對學術自由與思想交流的斫害甚巨。

這項以林連玉之名訂立的學術講座,已行之多年,縱有意識形態或認同差異,理應海納百川、暢所欲言,這才不失為學術自由的場域與倡議團體的高度。不過,中港臺議題像是一面「學術思想自由的照妖鏡」,我們看到許多聲稱以推動公民社會、貫徹多元文化為職志的華團,依舊存在著政治正確與自我審查。

回顧近年國內華團所為,自我審查已早有先例。20101019日,隆雪華堂因中國駐馬大使館關切,展延屬下民權委員會主辦的「劉曉波獲獎:中國民主的歷史機遇?」講座,臨時加入親中講者,導致原訂兩名主講人不滿退出。時值中國異議人士劉曉波獲頒諾貝爾和平獎之際,包括華總、董總在內,不少本國華團表態呼應中方,嚴辭譴責頒獎具政治意圖,破壞中國和平穩定。較早前,今年928日,隆雪華堂報警自保,企圖與其毗鄰範圍的「929大馬撐港反極權集會」撇清關係,招致輿論撻伐,事後雖然道歉,亦難挽聲譽蒙塵。

這些事例,有者因外力介入萌生變數,有者因自保而漠視公民憲賦權利,雖然情節不一,但同樣都是自我審查、屈從壓力的結果。惟十年前後,除了民主素養滯後,遺憾的是,還自設言論禁區,舉凡遇到中港臺議題,仿如驚「共」之鳥,已是華團逐底競爭(race to the bottom)的常態。無論民族情緒使然,或集體利益計算,華團的自主性依然搖搖欲墜,與平日面對馬來西亞政府時的道德勇氣與堅持,實不可同日而語。

社會改革雖無法求畢其功於一役,但絕無時機不當的問題。林連玉先生一生為華文教育奮鬥,落得公民權遭褫奪、失去教師資格,亦無怨無悔。唯有秉持「富貴不能淫,貧賤不能移,威武不能屈」的林連玉精神,才是體現其理想主張的做法,才能「經得起時代的考驗」。面對挑戰,獨立而不偽中立,不向權勢屈服、反擊無理對待,這是我們對林連玉基金的寄語,亦與公民社會同仁共勉之。

群议社Agora Society
2.11.2019


世界級的大學 需要世界級的校長


群議社強烈譴責馬來亞大學所犯下的怯懦行為,學運人士黄彦铬抗議促請馬大校長阿都拉欣(Abdul Rahim Hashim)引咎辭職,而馬大就此單一抗議事件報警。我們認為此類性質的抗議並不值得報警,它只會危及馬大至今殘存的任何善意或良好聲譽。

馬大這所曾經相當優秀的高等學府,竟然因為其學生發表對校長的看法而訴諸警察來調查學生,群議社對此非常失望。我們認為馬大是我國最著名高等學府,今日黃生一案,再次顯示馬大校風與官網上所宣稱的「秉持開放與專業態度」乃背道而馳,令人備感諷刺。

根據新聞報導,馬大所提出「黃彦铬的一人抗議活動不尊重當日儀式」。但根據當天畢業典禮的視頻,證明了黃彦铬的舉動並沒有破壞儀式,而只是讓眾人嚇了一跳。與馬大聲稱的正相反,當天儀式非常和平肅穆地完成,僅在儀式結束後和某些群體中表達其不滿。

事實上,黃彦铬當天的舉動絲毫不影響活動流程。因此,黃生並沒有不尊重儀式,而是無意中挑戰了馬大校方的公權力。若馬大無法容忍些許批評和異議之聲,我們必須質疑,馬大是否真的能實現理想,成為國際知名兼具研究創新出版教學等各個方面均卓越的一所高等教育機構。

我們也非常不同意黃生舉動將破壞馬大聲譽之說法,反之,馬大應為黃彦铬而辯護,因為黃彦铬此舉的出發點,是為了捍衛一個對言論更寬容的校園環境(甚至大馬國土),馬大應為良好校譽而辯護,馬大應為任何類似黃彦铬這樣具進步立場的學生而辯護。唯一會損害馬大聲譽的,校方向警方報案檢舉此學生,並維護發表種族主義言論的校長。

此外,馬大報案之後,還跟著禁止另一名馬大生官華恩參加畢業典禮,理由是擔心其妨礙公共秩序。官華恩已承諾不會舉牌抗議,但仍無濟於事。群議社質疑馬大是否有必要採取此嚴厲行動,畢竟官華恩已承諾不會在畢業典禮上採取任何抗議行動。

隨後,鑑於馬大最近對持不同政見者的態度,黃彦铬還擔心因公開挑戰校長而無法如期收到畢業證書。校方聲稱黃彦铬的畢業證書被神秘地弄髒,而且遇上印制難題,因此黃彦铬的擔憂並非杞人憂天。群議社呼籲馬大,別為了否定這批年輕畢業生的言論,而採取各種針對個人的報復,並抹滅學生過去四年努力學習的成果。

希盟政府對此事的回應同樣令人憤慨,畢竟他們在第十四屆馬來西亞全國大選期間曾呼籲建立一個學術更加自由和寬容的馬來西亞,但在馬大畢業典禮事件中卻無跡可尋。令人失望的是,警方此後傳召了黃彦铬進行更進一步的調查。

毫無疑問的,馬大校長阿都拉欣最近發表的言論並不合乎所謂的「新馬來西亞」,他的觀點應受到嚴厲譴責和質疑。自此以來,公民社會對馬大的批評和要校長辭職的呼聲日益強烈,群議社對此明確支持。

我們也聲援其他像黃彦铬一樣反對種族主義言論的學生。最後,我們必須提醒馬大,大學是一個能兼融各式各樣發人深省意識形態,並以專業和理性來辯論的場所。領導決定了一個機構的發展方向,大學也不例外。因此,我們呼籲馬大,若它仍願意捍衛學術自由及校譽,應盡速撤回不必要的警方報案。

群議社 Agora Society
17.10.2019

A World Class University Needs a World Class Vice Chancellor

Agora Society strongly condemn the cowardice act perpetrated by University Malaya (UM) for lodging a police report against student activist Wong Yan Ke. The police report was made in light of a solo protest by Yan Ke calling for the resignation of the varsity’s vice-chancellor, Datuk Abdul Rahim Hashim. A protest of such nature certainly does not merit a police report, but it would only serve to jeopardize whatever goodwill or reputation that UM still had left. Agora Society is gravely disappointed that the once great education institution had since resorted to the police to help investigate its own student for expressing his views about the vice-chancellor. It is to our view that UM, as being the most prominent university in Malaysia, does not deserve to be associated with values such as open-mindedness and professionalism which are ironically on full display in their official website.

According to news report, UM has cited Yan Ke’s one-man protest has disrespected the protocol and running of the ceremony. But video evidence has suggested that Yan Ke’s action did not disrupt the ceremony but merely startled a part of the crowd. And as opposed to what UM has alleged, the ceremony at that day ended peacefully and grievances were only shown after the ceremony and among certain sections of the crowd. This does not in any way disrupt the flow of the event that day. Therefore, Yan Ke did not in any way disrespect the ceremony, but it has inadvertently ruffled a few feathers of those powers-to-be in UM. If UM is unable to tolerate criticism and dissent from a lonesome student, then it is debatable that UM could truly live up to its ideals of being an internationally renowned institution of higher learning in research, innovation, publication and teaching.

Agora Society also strongly disagree with the fact that Yan Ke’s action has tarnished the reputation of UM as alleged by the latter. Yan Ke’s defence for a more tolerant UM and Malaysia should be applauded instead and a reputable University should instead defend any student with progressive stance like Yan Ke. The only move we have seen that is tarnishing the UM’s reputation currently is the police report made against a recalcitrant student and defending a purportedly racist Vice Chancellor.

Furthermore, UM has since followed up its police reports by barring another fellow student and associate of Yan Ke, Edan Kon Hua En from attending his convocation ceremony for fear of disrupting public order. Edan has promised that he would not be protesting or displaying placard but to no avail. Agora Society question the need for such harsh actions for denying a student his finest moment in University when he himself has promised there would be no protest during the ceremony. Subsequently, Yan Ke is also worried that he might not be receiving his transcript for openly defying the Vice Chancellor. Given that UM’s recent attitude towards dissent and Yan Ke’s transcript has been mysteriously smudged and experiencing printing difficulties in publication, the graduate’s worry is not unfounded and Agora Society want to remind UM not to engage in personal and petty revenge for denying a fellow young graduate’s four years of achievement.

The PH government’s response has been equally damning as they were calling for academic freedom and a more tolerant Malaysia during the last general election, yet they were nowhere to be seen in this whole incident. It is also disappointing that the police have since taken action by summoning Yan Ke for further investigation.

It is undisputedly clear that what Datuk Abdul Rahim Hashim has uttered recently is not befitting in the so called ‘New Malaysia’ and his views should be rebuked and challenged. Criticism against UM and the call for the resignation of the Vice Chancellor stemming from civil society and public has since risen and Agora Society are unequivocally supportive of it. We also wish to send solidarity to all the students who harbour the same view as Yan Ke. Lastly, we remind UM that university is a place embraces diverse and though-provoking ideologies and debate them professionally and rationally. Leaderships dictating how an institution will go, university not excluded. Thus, we urge UM to withdraw its unnecessary police report if it still harbours any intention of defending academic freedom and the reputation of UM.

Agora Society Malaysia
17.10.2019


Kenyataan 929 Agora Society “Bersolidariti dengan Hong Kong, Tolak Totalitarianisme”

(Kenyataan berikutnya dibaca oleh ahli Agora Kenneth Cheng Chee Kin pada pukul 7.18 mlm, di tempak letak kereta awam berdekatan dengan KLSCAH)

Salam Sejahtera and Salam Demokrasi. Atas jemputan penganjur, saya mewakili NGO Agora Society untuk memberi sepatah kata tentang demonstrasi 29th September Malaysia Bersolidariti dengan Hong Kong. Pertama sekali, saya ingin mengucapkan ribuan terima kasih kepada semua yang hadir meskipun ada tekanan sosial dari pihak tertentu.

Dalam tempoh tiga bulan ini, kita telah menyaksikan keberanian dan keteguhan penduduk Hong Kong menurun ke jalan raya berturut-turut untuk membela hak kebebasan mereka. Protes ini dicetuskan kerana penduduk Hong Kong tidak berpuas hati dengan kerajaan Hong Kong untuk meluluskan satu rang undang-undang yang akan membenarkan ekstradisi dari Hong Kong ke Tanah Besar China. Ini adalah kerana undang-undang Hong Kong adalah
sangat berbeza daripada Tanah Besar China, penduduk Hong Kong menyifat tindakan ini telah menjejaskan prinsip “satu negara, dua system” yang dijanji oleh Kerajaan People’s Republic of China pada tahun 1997. Jadi pada mulanya, penduduk Hong Kong hanya semata-mata menuntut agar rang undang undang itu dibatalkan.

Namun demikian, oleh sebab tuntutan tersebut, penduduk Hong Kong telah mengalami pelbagai salah laku polis seperti keganasan polis. Polis Hong Kong juga disyaki bekerjasama dengan kongsi gelap untuk memburukkan imej penduduk Hong Kong yang terus menuntut dan mempertahankan hak mereka. Kita merayu agar pihak polis di Hong Kong berhenti dengan semua salah laku dan meminta kerajaan Hong Kong bermula dialog dengan pihak tertentu untuk bekerjasama dan mencari jalan penyelesaian.
Saya juga ingin mengambil peluang ini untuk merakamkan perhargaan kepada penduduk Hong Kong yang masih percaya pada prinsip kebebasan, demokrasi dan kerajaan yang bertanggungjawab (‘accountable’), terutamanya mereka pernah memberi sokongan kepada warga Malaysia. Penduduk Hong Kong telah memberi solidariti waktu kita menuntut pilihan raya yang lebih bersih melalui protes di jalan raya pada masa itu. Semua prinsip yang saya sebut tadi sepatutnya tidak mengira kaum, agama dan kewarganegaraan dan inilah sebab utama kita yang memegang prinsip yang sama dengan penduduk Hong Kong berhimpun di sini untuk memberi sokongan dan solidariti kepada penduduk Hong Kong.
Terima Kasih!

群議社929撐香港反極權聲明


(由社員鄭至健代表發言,時間為傍晚7.18,於隆雪華堂外的停車場)

群議社重申:過去將近四個月以來,香港市民因為反對港府修訂法例上街示威抗議,實乃愛港護港的表現,亦符合一國兩制原則背後港人治港的精神,應予以肯定;遺憾的是,香港當局的激烈回應方式已經導致暴力事件一再發生,例如721元朗事件,831太子站事件,以及921元朗黃色物體事件等,過程中多人受傷,更有黑社會和警方人員涉及對民眾的無差別攻擊。林鄭月娥為首的港府雖已撤回修訂,但堅辭不肯成立獨立調查委員會,並一而再再而三把警方當作政治工具。五大訴求主要是恢復香港法治精髓,面對警方黑社會和港鐵的多方對付,示威者別無他選唯有升級鬥爭模式。

馬來西亞人在過去20年間亦經歷馬哈迪、阿都拉和納吉領導的國陣政府多次以暴力打壓爭取實質民主的和平示威,其中數次淨選盟大集會更得到香港民主人士的聲援與支持,我們對此深表感激;即使馬來西亞最終迎來201859日的首次政權更迭,馬哈迪領導的希盟政府尚未盡力修正甚或廢除國陣時代留下的一系列箝制言論與集會自由的惡法,我們因此深刻了解在前線的香港民眾如今每一天都在面對港府背後的集權國家暴力,不斷被警察打、被逮捕,沒有申訴管道,但仍然很堅定地堅持著五大訴求。群議社對港人奮力捍衛法治與追求民主的行為心有戚戚,并譴責香港警方以暴力回應和平示威的群眾。

最後,群議社呼籲曾經以街頭抗爭爭取民主的馬來西亞人理解港人的訴求,走出狹隘的民族主義,共同創建一個超越國界與族群的民主聲援機制。

抗議隆雪華堂報警自保 籲虛心檢討接受公評

我們以下聯署團體,認為吉隆坡暨雪蘭莪中華大會堂(隆雪華堂)日前報警因應「929大馬撐港反極權集會」一事,已經逾越公民社會的容忍底線,在此表達嚴正抗議。


這項集會乃本國民間團體自發響應「香港反對《逃犯條例》修訂草案運動」(反送中運動),原訂在隆雪華堂門外空地舉行的活動,並非隆雪華堂號召或主辦,也不在隆雪華堂範圍內進行。據媒體報導,隆雪華堂執行長李書禎以該會租戶、訪客的人身安全和財務保障爲由,於928日主動前往班登英達(Pandan Indah)警局報案,並聲明這場活動與隆雪華堂無關。

這些砌詞妄議的理由,這種無視公民憲賦集會權利的自保行為,不啻為公民組織的墮落,日後可能成為其餘團體效法的錯誤示範。須知道,大會堂外的空地和馬路,屬於公共空間,並非隆雪華堂的私人財產。隆雪華堂不是企業公司,是歷來以民主人權先鋒自居,在國內華團中鶴立雞群的公民組織。今年616日在同一地點舉行的「反送中集會」,已證明就算這類涉及複雜爭議的集會示威,並無人尋釁滋擾,亦無任何違反公共秩序之情事發生。如果隆雪華堂怕被誤認為主辦單位,只要簡短文告說明即可,完全無報警備案的必要;如果隆雪華堂擔憂交通秩序受阻,關切租戶訪客人身安全,大可組織糾察,跨出大門(像其「跨族群」口號那樣)現場協調監查,重則關起閘門自保,以策安全。遗憾的是,如今報警自保的下策,有助中國利用本國國家機關壓制集会自由之嫌。主辦者受到施壓後,集會雖未取消,但被迫更改在遠離隆雪華堂的地方舉行,這已是對集會自由權利的斫害。

事已至此,我們籲請隆雪華堂董事會認真檢討此事,虛心接受各界公評,儘速對此公開說明原委。否則,日後不應再高舉道德高地,侈言舉凡與民主人權、憲賦權利有關的議題,終究只是律人而非律己。

聯署團體:
群議社(Agora Society
中國維權大馬後援會(馬中維權)
業餘者 Amateur
當今峇南(Baramkini
博大前進陣線(GMMUPM
北大前進陣線(SPF UUM
國大學生團結陣線(SUFUKM
馬大新青年(UMANY
維護媒體獨立撰稿人聯盟(WAMI
優大議題組(Youtar


29.9.2019


停止“種族定性”與恫嚇記者


群议社文告,2019年8月27日于吉隆坡

群議社對於當今大馬記者吳湘怡近日遭企業發展部長禮端種族定性”(racial profiling)一事感到震驚。

今年819日,記者吳湘怡於一公開場合要求相關部長進一步解釋後者之前發表的巫裔給臉論,禮端不正面回答,卻反問對方是否知道憲法和國家原則。儘管吳湘怡回答了知道并希望部長針對提問發言,禮端卻自行下結論,傲慢地指對方不知道

事後,禮端將訪問視頻放上其官方臉書,并加了部長驚訝有華裔記者不知道馬來西亞憲法”(“Menteri terkejut” ada wartawan Bangsa Cina Tak tahu pelembagaan Malaysia)的標題,行為舉止有違其部長的身份。

作為一名公職人員,禮端應該秉持專業,無私,負責和開放的態度,尤其在面對第四權的媒體之時,更應該秉持公正的精神回答提問,絲毫不考慮提問者的宗教,性別或族群背景。這位土團黨籍的領袖刻意突出當今大馬記者的族群背景,試圖轉移視線,并透過加深他人對個別族群的刻板印象以達到恫嚇媒體人的目的,已完全背離一名部長應有的行為規範,群議社予以強烈譴責。

眾所周知,衡量一個民主體制的標準之一在於媒體人能夠無私無畏地執行任務,質詢,質疑甚至挑戰權力。國陣執政時期,馬來西亞複雜的族群,宗教和政治結構為新聞工作者帶來了極大的壓力,因為一個不慎,一則看似無害的政治新聞報導就會被有心人士操弄成種族或宗教議題。

所謂改朝換代以後,馬來西亞本應如國防部副部長劉鎮東所言,享有完全的新聞自由,可惜希盟政府依舊保留了一系列國陣時期的惡法;從馬哈迪以降,儼然巫統2.0的土團不時有領袖發表狹隘與種族主義的言論;禮端近日對當今大馬華裔記者的舉止留下了極為惡劣的示範,徒增其他媒體人往後採訪被視為敏感議題時候的心理壓力甚至自我設限,影響採訪的素質。

群議社強烈要求希盟政府正視禮端不當的言行,予以適當的懲戒,以免其他政治人物有樣學樣。我們也呼籲其他公民團體和公眾與我們一起共同監督朝野政黨的言行舉止,因為我們相信對政治勢力最好的制衡與監督,就是建立一個強大的公民社會。

群议社Agora Society

Stop racial-profiling and intimidating journalists


Press Statement by Agora Society on 27 August 2019 in Kuala Lumpur

The Agora Society is appalled at the racial profiling of Ng Xiangyi, a Malaysiakini journalist, by the Entrepreneur Development Minister Mohd Redzuan bin Md Yusof, in recent days.

Ms. Ng was asking the minister to elaborate on his previous claims that “the Malays have compromised too much” at a public event on 19th of August. Instead of addressing the question, Redzuan replied by asking the journalist if she knew of the Malaysian Constitution and Rukunegara. Ms. Ng replied that she is aware of the constitution and Rukunegara and kept probing for the minister’s comments on the issue raised, however, Redzuan abruptly and arrogantly concluded that she "doesn’t know".

Later, Redzuan uploaded a video clip of the exchange on his official Facebook page with a caption that reads "Minister surprised at a Chinese reporter's ignorance of the Malaysian Constitution" ("Menteri terkejut" ada wartawan Bangsa Cina Tak tahu pelembagaan Malaysia), an act that is unbecoming of his position as a minister.

Being an office-bearer, Redzuan should adhere to the principles of professionalism, impartiality, responsibility and openness, especially when faced with the Fourth Estate, ie. the media. He ought to answer the question in an unbiased manner without taking into account the questioner's religious, gender or ethnic background.

By deliberately highlighting the ethnicity of the Malaysiakini journalist with a view to divert the attention and secondly, intimidating Ms. Ng through reinforcing the stereotypes about other ethnic groups, the Pribumi party leader has completely deviated from the code of conduct that is expected of a minister. Agora therefore condemns in no uncertain terms his behaviour as such.

It goes without saying that a yardstick for democratic evaluation is whether media operators are able to carry out their duties without any harassment, ie. inquiring, questioning and even challenging the powers-that-be, without fear or favour. Malaysia under the Barisan Nasional government had been plagued by complex political, religious and ethnic structures that exerted enormous pressures on media workers, as a seemingly harmless news report could be easily turned into a racial or religious issue by irresponsible parties.

As Liew Chin Tong, the deputy defence minister, has said, Malaysians after the so-called regime change should be entitled to exercise an unbridled yet responsible press freedom. Yet, Pakatan Harapan has not been practicing what they preached and chose to keep intact a series of arbitrary laws bequeathed by Barisan Nasional, Pribumi leaders - from Mahathir Mohamad downwards - have even made statements that border on bigotry and racism at times, giving rise to the increasingly popular perception that the Malay party bears a striking resemblance to UMNO.

Redzuan's recent conduct towards the Malaysiakini reporter - who is of Chinese origin - has set a disgraceful example, as a result of which other media workers may begin to experience psychological pressures or even practise self-censorship when covering "sensitive" issues, thereby affecting the quality of Malaysia’s news.

In closing, the Agora Society strongly demands that the Pakatan Harapan government take Redzuan's lack of decorum seriously and prescribe disciplinary actions commensurate therewith, so that other politicians would not take a leaf from him.

We also urge other civil society organizations and the general public to shoulder together with us the task of monitoring the conduct of politicians, government and opposition alike, for we believe a strong civil society is the best way to check and balance against political forces in the country.

Agora Society Malaysia
27.8.2019

希盟政府需立即停止打压异议,警方应撤回调查莱纳斯集会

群议社文告,2019年8月22日于吉隆坡
对于警方上周日(2019年8月17日)在关丹举行的反莱纳斯集会而传召五人的举动,群议社深感失望和不满。这五人为:彭亨州士满慕州议员李健聪、德伦敦州议员沈春祥、拯救大马委员会(Save Malaysia! Stop Lynas!)召集人陈文德、法律顾问韩启竝和秘书徐盛鹏。

警方的行动已违反马来西亚宪法所赋予民众和平集会的权利。群议社向五位与会者表达最深切的声援,并要求警方立即撤回任何形式的调查。

和平集会是所有马来西亚人享有的自由。前国阵政府因拘留或提控和平示威者而恶名昭彰,希盟以往曾借用和平集会之名,抗议警方不公义的拘捕行动。然而,政权转移后,希盟似乎忘记以前所捍卫的权利,如今连希盟后座州议员也无法幸免这些无意义的调查。

希盟政府更新莱纳斯稀土厂营运执照的决定确实触怒了许多马来西亚人,特别是关丹居民,因为这项举动违反了希盟其中一个极为重要的选举承诺。

东方日报最新民调显示,超过90%马来西亚人不支持更新莱纳斯执照。职是之故,马来西亚人抗议新政府背弃诺言,完全合理,道德上也站得住脚。当天在场的群议社社员也证实,这是一场和平抗议,出席者也有老人和小孩。而且,集会在一个适合家庭活动的公园里面进行。有鉴于此,当局毫无基础盘问这五名人士,除非政府或警方背后存有打压政治异议的意图。

再者,主办单位也已充分配合及遵守2012年和平集会法令,在18天以前就知会警方,比法令所要求的10天还多了8天,可谓诚意十足。尽管如此,警方竟指这五人没有在集会5天之前向关丹市议会(MPK)取得使用Taman Gelora公园的准证。

事实上,拯救大马委员会之前已多番强调,他们在集会21天前已两度向关丹市议会申请准证,先是被拒绝,然后被冷待。因此,拯救大马委员会别无选择,只能径自集会。与其调查主办单位,警方不如把注意力转向关丹市议会,去了解后者为何不回复主办单位的申请。

同时,群议社也要质问国阵特别是马华公会,对此事的立场。既然关丹市议会由国阵掌控,没理由不批准主办单位使用Taman Gelora公园,除非市议会想打压政治异议,并且支持更新莱纳斯营运执照。若是如此,我们不得不质疑马华批评希盟立场反复的诚意,毕竟他们和希盟一样言行不一。

最重要的是,停止警方调查最终责任在于联邦政府,以确保往后示威人士能够无畏无惧行使集会自由。

群议社忠告希盟:希盟能在选举赢得支持,得以执政,源头在于公众积极热忱响应当时在野党的一系列政治集会,尽管当时可能招致国阵政府逮捕。修正后的和平集会法令并非完美,惟至少在捍卫集会权利方面有所改善。但这样的调查行动无疑让马来西亚人对希盟政府的改革意愿产生疑问。如果政府继续把本身的无能及不愿奋力兑现选举承诺的表现归咎于前朝,同时在政治上搞小动作(petty politicking),只会引发更强烈的政治反弹。

简言之:水可载舟亦可覆舟。希盟政府应该停止任何形式的打压行动,而把焦点放在落实对人民的承诺。
群议社Agora Society

PH Government Should Immediately Stop Stifling Political Dissent

Press Statement by Agora Society on 22 August 2019 in Kuala Lumpur
Agora Society is deeply disappointed and frustrated at the summoning of five persons by the police for organizing and attending the anti-Lynas rally held in Kuantan last Sunday (17th August 2019). The decision of calling up both Pahang state assemblyperson Lee Chean Chung, Sim Chon Siang, Save Malaysia Save Lynas (SMSL) organiser Tan Bun Teet, SMSL legal adviser Hon Kai Ping and SMSL secretary Chu Seng Poon infringes the right of Malaysia’s right to peaceful assembly which is enshrined in the Federal Constitution. We send our deepest solidarity to the five attendees and demand the police to withdraw immediately any form of investigation on them.
The freedom to assemble peacefully is a right enjoyed by all Malaysians, and, incidentally, it is also the same reason used by various PH politicians to defend against their unjust arrest when the former BN government has gained the notorious reputation of detaining or charging peaceful protesters. The PH government has seemingly forgotten the right they were espousing strongly before this, and even PH state backbenchers are not spared from such meaningless investigations after the transition of power.
The latest decision on renewing the operating license of Lynas plant has indeed infuriated many Malaysians, especially the people of Kuantan, for going against a very consequential electoral promise made by PH. The latest poll conducted by The Oriental Daily and 988 radio station also shows that more than 90% of Malaysians do not support the further renewal of the Lynas plant’s license. Therefore, it is perfectly justifiable and morally legitimate for Malaysians to protest against a newly elected government’s broken promise. Some Agora’s members which were present during the rally could testify it was a protest that is as peaceful as a protest could be and its participants ranged from the elderlies to toddlers. Furthermore, it was held in a family friendly park. There is absolutely no reason to question the five persons for not having a peaceful assembly unless the government or police real intention was to stifle political dissent.
The organisers have also cooperated and fully complied with the regulations set forth by the Peaceful Assembly Act (PAA) 2012 by notifying the police 18 days before the protest – the PAA stipulates that the rally organisers need to inform the police 10 days in advance. However, the police’s pretext for investigating the 5 persons were the alleged failure to obtain permission from Majlis Perbandaran Kuantan (MPK) for the use of the Taman Gelora Park. Yet, SMSL organisers have at numerous occasions stressed that they have twice requested approval from MPK 21 days before the event but it was first rejected and subsequently ignored. Therefore, SMSL organisers were left with no choice but to proceed with the rally. Instead of investigating the organisers, the police should turn their attention toward MPK for failing to respond to the request of the organisers.
Agora Society would also like to take this opportunity to question the opposition parties BN, and especially MCA’s stance on this matter. Since MPK is still under the control of BN, there is no ground for MPK to not approve the use of Taman Gelora Park unless MPK aims to deter political dissent and is supportive of the license renewal of Lynas plant. If the latter were true, we question the sincerity of MCA’s latest stance on criticizing PH for flip-flopping on the Lynas plant issue, for they are equally complicit of not practicing what they preach.
Most of all, the buck stops at the federal government for ending this investigation and assuring future protesters could safely exercise their right to assemble. Agora society wishes to remind PH that the electoral support they have amassed which enabled them to form a government were no less derived from the series of political rallies which the public so enthusiastically supported despite the arrest threat from BN government. The amended Peaceful Assembly Act was not perfect yet it is an improvement for defending the right to assemble but investigations of this nature would render Malaysians once again feeling doubtful about the reform commitments of the PH government.
Finally, any form of political dissents would only increase if the government continues to blame the previous administration for its incompetency and not committed to fulfilling its promises while busying itself with petty politicking.
PH government should do well to remember on ceasing any means of stifling political dissent and instead focusing on fulfilling all that which has been promised to the people.
Agora Society Malaysia
22.8.2019

政府应向人民而非莱纳斯负责

群议社文告,2019810日于吉隆坡

针对希望联盟政府许可莱纳斯稀土厂继续营运的决定,群议社认为政府此举罔顾民意,强力谴责希盟政治领袖背信弃义。
政府所给出的唯一理由乃是首相马哈迪所言:政府既已对外来投资者作出承诺,就不能关闭莱纳斯。这样的理由难以成立。首先,希盟上台不久,就已在高铁和东铁是否取消的问题上反反复复,因而所谓外资方面的考量其实不如马哈迪说的那样坚定不移。而且,真正从莱纳斯创造的经济效益中获利的,究竟是哪些既得利益者、比例多少、是否涵盖了其营运所带来的风险(人民须承担的医疗成本与意外事故清理费用)等等,希盟政府始终没有给出合理透明的解说。
此外,既然一些议员曾经强调莱纳斯必须把稀土厂废料移出大马,否则必须关闭工厂,那么如今政府决策所反映的,究竟是执政联盟仅仅是马哈迪一言堂,抑或是包括环境部部长在内的民意代表一直以来都只是极不专业地信口开河?
《希望宣言》承诺不为商业利益破坏环境和伤害人民安全,而希盟里许多政治领袖曾组成的人民联盟亦在第13届大选宣言承诺关闭稀土厂。政府倘若以不能违背对外资的承诺为由而保留莱纳斯稀土厂,其实就是以违背对人民的承诺作为代价。
政府必须认清自己的角色,其问责对象是人民,不是外来企业。稀土厂带来的隐忧不只是废料的辐射问题,它运作时排放的废水、非放射性废料以及废料再循环制成品所含有毒物质(如致癌重金属),都会造成土壤和水源污染,危害人体健康。希盟政府必须基于预警原则,信守承诺关闭稀土厂。
曾经宣扬莱纳斯应把废料移出大马的政治人物也忽视了跨境运送放射性废料和其他有毒废料是极度艰难且危险的事实,他们若非不具相关知识,就是刻意瞒骗人民。而且,既然我们强烈谴责西方国家将他们的垃圾运来我国丢弃,同理,本地生产的废料也不应该运往他国丢弃。
有鉴于此,希盟政府应立即关闭稀土厂,中止日以继夜的废料生产,并且要求莱纳斯稀土厂缴付一笔足以应付它所产生的有毒废料永久性储存装置费用(时间段至少120年或更长)。该装置应由世界先进国相关专业公司进行并向国会问责,定时呈交装置设备安全检测。如果莱纳斯稀土厂无法获得妥善处置,曾经主张关闭稀土厂、参与反莱纳斯抗争、借该议题攻击前朝政府的虚伪政治领袖,必须引咎辞职以示负责。
我们同时也吁请莱纳斯遵守自己国家的环境法律,留在国内生产和提炼稀土,那么他们就必须根据法律把废料运回开采的原矿场,不要双重标准。我们不希望他们继续寻找下一个受害国,让该国自行处理原本不属于他们的废料,遗毒万年。
因此,群议社呼吁民众继续支持反莱纳斯绿色运动,并现身参与818在关丹举行的抗议集会,以表达对政府处理这课题的强烈不满。只要一日人民反对的力量依然存在和壮大,莱纳斯和政府就应该倍感压力并重新评估时局、改变政策。
人民的健康才是国家的财富,莱纳斯的盈利不是。
群议社